{"id":620,"date":"2026-01-08T05:03:42","date_gmt":"2026-01-08T05:03:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/resources.onestowatch.com\/chartmetric-discover-new-talent\/"},"modified":"2026-09-10T05:09:03","modified_gmt":"2026-09-10T05:09:03","slug":"chartmetric-discover-new-talent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/chartmetric-discover-new-talent\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Use Chartmetric to Discover Emerging Artists"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Written by: Kai Eldridge, Music Discovery Editor, OnesToWatch | Last updated: July 29, 2026<\/em><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"key-takeaways\">Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Chartmetric\u2019s 7-phase workflow turns raw streaming and social data into a repeatable monthly shortlist of 20\u201350 pre-viral unsigned artists.<\/li>\n<li>Phases 1\u20132 use career-stage filters and momentum metrics such as streams per listener, save rate, and growth to narrow thousands of profiles down to 50\u2013150 high-potential candidates.<\/li>\n<li>Phases 3\u20135 validate cross-platform velocity, expand via neighboring-artist clusters, and confirm playlist-mix quality plus geographic engagement before final shortlisting.<\/li>\n<li>Phases 6\u20137 automate monthly alerts and hand candidates off to editorial validation or label pitching with one-page scout reports.<\/li>\n<li>Discover your next favorite artist and the stories behind their rise on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.onestowatch.com\/en\" target=\"_blank\">OnesToWatch<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>How the 7-Phase Chartmetric Workflow Fits Together<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Talent Search Setup<\/strong>, where you apply career-stage and genre filters to generate an initial candidate pool.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Momentum and Growth Metric Sorting<\/strong>, where you rank candidates by genre-appropriate thresholds and remove weak signals.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Predict Feature and Viral-Flag Review<\/strong>, where you identify artists flagged for 30\u201360-day viral inflection.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Neighboring Artists Cluster Expansion<\/strong>, where you expand the pool using genre and momentum filters on related-artist clusters.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Playlist Journey and Audience Geography Checks<\/strong>, where you validate engagement quality and geographic concentration.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shortlisting and Alert Configuration<\/strong>, where you build a tracked shortlist and configure monthly monitoring alerts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hand-Off to Editorial or Pitching Channels<\/strong>, where you transition confirmed candidates to editorial validation or label pitching.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>Phase 1: Talent Search Setup with Career-Stage Filters<\/h2>\n<p>Start in Chartmetric\u2019s Talent Search panel and set Career Stage to <em>Emerging<\/em> (Artist Score 1\u201330) for unsigned acts with minimal mainstream exposure, or <em>Developing<\/em> (Artist Score 31\u201355) for acts with a growing but pre-viral profile. Add your target genre tag and a geographic region if the brief requires market-specific scouting.<\/p>\n<p>Set a minimum monthly listener floor of 5,000 to exclude inactive profiles, and a ceiling of 250,000 to stay below the range where major-label interest usually accelerates. Phase 1 should give you a filtered list of roughly 200\u2013500 candidate profiles ready for momentum sorting.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Decision point:<\/strong> If the filtered list returns fewer than 100 results, you need more candidates to keep the data meaningful, so widen the genre tag or raise the listener ceiling to capture more profiles. If it returns more than 800, the pool becomes too large for efficient manual review, so add a secondary filter such as a minimum TikTok sound-usage count or a minimum Shazam spike count in the past 30 days.<\/p>\n<h2>Phase 2: Sorting by Streams, Saves, and Growth<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/orphiq.com\/resources\/a-and-r-in-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">In 2026, A&amp;R teams flag artists with streams per listener below 2 as having passive playlist audiences<\/a>, and they treat high streams paired with low saves as temporary attention rather than fan intent. Sort the Phase 1 list by streams-per-listener ratio in descending order, then apply the genre-appropriate thresholds in the table below. This table shows the specific numeric benchmarks that separate engaged fan bases from passive playlist audiences across four critical signals.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Signal<\/th>\n<th>Healthy (Target)<\/th>\n<th>Weak (Exclude)<\/th>\n<th>Source<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Streams per listener<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/orphiq.com\/resources\/a-and-r-in-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Above 3\u20134 (engaged fans)<\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/orphiq.com\/resources\/a-and-r-in-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Below 2 (passive listeners)<\/a><\/td>\n<td>Orphiq A&amp;R 2026<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Spotify save rate<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.strmmusic.com\/en\/the-future-of-independent-music-trends-and-benchmarks-for-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Above 8%<\/a><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/learn.andrmusic.co\/en\/articles\/13674359-scout-reports-and-artist-evaluation-a-r-scouting-guide\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Below 3%<\/a><\/td>\n<td>StrmMusic 2026; ANDR Music<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Monthly listener growth<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.strmmusic.com\/en\/the-future-of-independent-music-trends-and-benchmarks-for-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">10%\u201320% month-over-month<\/a><\/td>\n<td>Flat or declining without a release<\/td>\n<td>StrmMusic 2026<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Instagram engagement rate<\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.strmmusic.com\/en\/the-future-of-independent-music-trends-and-benchmarks-for-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Above 5% organic<\/a><\/td>\n<td>High followers, low engagement (potential purchased audience)<\/td>\n<td>StrmMusic 2026<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/orphiq.com\/resources\/a-and-r-in-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Apply the idea that a smaller, engaged audience in an underserved niche outweighs a larger passive audience in an oversaturated market.<\/a> Use that principle when comparing candidates across genres. Phase 2 should leave you with a ranked list of 50\u2013150 candidates that clear your momentum thresholds.<\/p>\n<h2>Phase 3: Reviewing Predict Flags and Viral Momentum<\/h2>\n<p>Chartmetric\u2019s Predict feature uses a proprietary model to flag artists 30\u201360 days ahead of viral inflection, defined as a 5x acceleration in cross-platform velocity over a 7-day window. Open the Predict panel and filter for artists in your Phase 2 shortlist who carry an active viral flag.<\/p>\n<p>For each flagged artist, review the cross-platform velocity breakdown. The dominant signals weighted by 2026 AI A&amp;R tools are TikTok velocity, Spotify Discover Weekly add-rate, save-to-stream ratio, and Spotify-to-Apple Music platform ratio, and the platform-priority table below shows the specific weightings.<\/p>\n<p>Prioritize artists where TikTok velocity and Discover Weekly add-rate are both rising at the same time, because that pattern indicates cross-platform momentum rather than a single-platform spike. Remove artists where the flag is driven exclusively by one platform. Phase 3 should leave you with a refined list of 30\u201380 candidates with confirmed multi-platform momentum.<\/p>\n<h2>Phase 4: Expanding with Neighboring Artist Clusters<\/h2>\n<p>For each artist passing Phase 3, open the Neighboring Artists panel in Chartmetric. This panel surfaces artists with overlapping audience profiles and genre tags. Apply the same Career Stage filter, either Emerging or Developing, and the same momentum floor from Phase 2 to the neighboring cluster.<\/p>\n<p>Work through the following steps for each seed artist so every action builds on the last one.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Open Neighboring Artists and export the top 20 related profiles, which gives you the raw cluster data.<\/li>\n<li>Filter exported profiles by Artist Score range that matches your Phase 1 settings to keep everyone in the same career stage.<\/li>\n<li>Apply the streams-per-listener and save-rate thresholds from Phase 2 to confirm that neighboring artists show the same quality of momentum as your seed artist.<\/li>\n<li>Add any new profiles passing both filters to the working candidate list, because these are net-new candidates you would not have found through Talent Search alone.<\/li>\n<li>Repeat for the top five seed artists from Phase 3 to avoid redundant clusters, since overlapping neighborhoods will surface the same profiles multiple times.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Cluster expansion usually adds 20\u201340 net-new candidates that the initial Talent Search did not surface. Phase 4 should end with an expanded candidate pool of up to 120 profiles.<\/p>\n<h2>Phase 5: Checking Playlist Journeys and Audience Geography<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/learn.andrmusic.co\/en\/articles\/13674359-scout-reports-and-artist-evaluation-a-r-scouting-guide\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">A healthy artist shows a mix of editorial, algorithmic, and user-generated playlist sources with a growing algorithmic and user-generated share over time, while heavy dependence on a single editorial playlist counts as a risk factor.<\/a> Open the Playlist Journey tab for each candidate and confirm that the playlist mix looks diversified.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/orphiq.com\/resources\/tracking-playlist-performance\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Placements achieving 5% or higher save rates indicate listeners converting into fans, while high streams paired with low saves signal low-quality placements that fail to build lasting audience.<\/a> Log save rate during each active placement so you can see which playlists actually build fans.<\/p>\n<p>Once you have confirmed playlist engagement quality, the next validation layer is geographic concentration, which shows where those engaged listeners are located. For geography, <a href=\"https:\/\/orphiq.com\/resources\/geographic-streaming-data\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">a city with 200 listeners who all save tracks is more valuable for tour or market prioritization than a city with 2,000 passive listeners acquired from a single playlist placement.<\/a> Flag any artist where more than 80% of streams originate from a single country that does not align with the target market.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/madverse.co\/feeds\/blog\/platforms-ai-driven-talent-scouting-music-tech\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Shazam activity in specific cities predicts roughly 50% of subsequent Spotify chart entries<\/a>, so cross-reference Shazam heat maps with streaming geography before removing a candidate. Phase 5 should leave you with a validated list of 20\u201360 candidates with confirmed engagement quality and viable geographic profiles.<\/p>\n<h2>Phase 6: Building the Shortlist and Setting Alerts<\/h2>\n<p>Add all Phase 5 candidates to a named Chartmetric watchlist. For each artist on the list, configure monthly alerts for the following triggers, which together catch both warning signs of momentum decay and opportunity signals from new placements or viral flags.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Streams-per-listener ratio drops below 3, which indicates weakening audience engagement.<\/li>\n<li>Save rate drops below 5%, which confirms listeners are no longer converting to fans.<\/li>\n<li>Monthly listener growth falls below 8% for two consecutive months, which flags sustained momentum loss rather than a single slow month.<\/li>\n<li>A new Predict viral flag activates, which signals an acceleration opportunity.<\/li>\n<li>A new editorial playlist placement is detected, which creates a window to validate whether the placement drives quality engagement.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Set alert delivery to a shared team inbox so no signal slips through between monthly review cycles. Phase 6 should give you a monitored shortlist of 20\u201350 pre-viral candidates with automated early-warning alerts.<\/p>\n<h2>Phase 7: Moving Candidates to Editorial and Label Pipelines<\/h2>\n<p>Artists passing all six phases are ready for editorial validation or direct label pitching. For editorial validation, cross-reference each shortlisted artist against existing coverage on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.onestowatch.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">OnesToWatch<\/a>, which has covered more than 850 artists over the past decade and maintains a structured pipeline from playlist inclusion through featured artist recognition to yearly selections. Artists not yet covered represent immediate pitching opportunities.<\/p>\n<p>For label pitching, prepare a one-page scout report per artist that includes Artist Score, streams-per-listener ratio, save rate trend across the last three releases, playlist mix breakdown, top three geographic markets by save rate, and any active Predict flags.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/en\/blog\/the-top-30-artists-to-watch-in-2026?fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGnTAbfp3pnyZuich6q2qOfIz9kmH-WY9qaWJISWZgI6qC7kAouAVjKEPdoNJg_aem_n268rY7j2YC_LY6Cva2j0A\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Check out OnesToWatch&#8217;s Top Artists To Watch in 2026<\/strong><\/a>, the curated editorial list that completes the discovery-to-validation journey for the most promising acts identified through this workflow.<\/p>\n<h2>2026 Platform-Priority Signal Weights<\/h2>\n<p>Platform weighting in A&amp;R discovery tools has shifted entering 2026, and certain signals now carry more influence than others. The table below reflects current signal priorities based on available benchmark data.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Platform \/ Signal<\/th>\n<th>2026 Weight in AI A&amp;R Tools<\/th>\n<th>Primary Metric to Track<\/th>\n<th>Source<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>TikTok sound velocity<\/td>\n<td>~28% (7\u201314 day usage curve)<\/td>\n<td>Sound usage acceleration<\/td>\n<td>Chartlex 2026<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Spotify Discover Weekly add-rate<\/td>\n<td>~18%<\/td>\n<td>Weekly algorithmic playlist adds<\/td>\n<td>Chartlex 2026<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Save-to-stream ratio<\/td>\n<td>~14%<\/td>\n<td>Saves divided by streams per release<\/td>\n<td>Chartlex 2026<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Spotify-to-Apple Music ratio<\/td>\n<td>~11%<\/td>\n<td>Cross-platform audience distribution<\/td>\n<td>Chartlex 2026<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>A&amp;R Checklist Before Phase 6 Shortlisting<\/h2>\n<p>Use this checklist as a clear go or no-go gate before moving any artist to Phase 6 shortlisting.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Career Stage set to Emerging (Score 1\u201330) or Developing (Score 31\u201355)<\/li>\n<li>Monthly listeners between 5,000 and 250,000<\/li>\n<li>Streams per listener above 3<\/li>\n<li>Spotify save rate above 5%, with above 8% preferred<\/li>\n<li>Month-over-month listener growth of 10%\u201320%<\/li>\n<li>Instagram organic engagement above 5%<\/li>\n<li>Playlist mix includes algorithmic and user-generated sources, not solely editorial<\/li>\n<li>Save rate during active playlist placements above 5%<\/li>\n<li>No single country accounts for more than 80% of streams, unless that market is the target<\/li>\n<li>Shazam heat map shows at least two viable markets<\/li>\n<li>Predict flag active or cross-platform velocity rising across at least two platforms<\/li>\n<li>Listener-to-follower conversion rate improving across the last two releases<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Common A&amp;R Workflow Mistakes to Avoid<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Over-filtering:<\/strong> Stacking more than five simultaneous filters in Talent Search often reduces the candidate pool below 20 results, which removes valid candidates in niche genres where absolute numbers stay structurally lower.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ignoring engagement quality:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/orphiq.com\/resources\/a-and-r-in-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">High streams but low saves signal temporary attention, not fan intent.<\/a> Raw listener counts without save-rate validation produce shortlists dominated by playlist-dependent artists with no organic demand.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Overly broad alerts:<\/strong> Configuring alerts without specific numeric thresholds generates notification volume that hides genuine momentum shifts. Every alert should trigger on a defined metric crossing a defined threshold.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Single-platform reliance:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/stereostickman.com\/how-independent-artists-can-trigger-spotifys-algorithm-in-2026\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Spotify&#8217;s recommendation systems reward consistent release quality and accumulating cross-platform audience engagement rather than single viral spikes.<\/a> Artists showing momentum on only one platform need additional validation before shortlisting.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>How to Evaluate Results After a Month<\/h2>\n<p>After one full monthly cycle, compare the following observable indicators against the baseline captured at shortlisting.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Month-over-month follower growth:<\/strong> Target at least an 8% increase for Emerging artists and 5% for Developing artists.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Pre-save velocity:<\/strong> Rising pre-save counts on new releases show that an artist is converting casual listeners into active fans ahead of release.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Save-to-stream ratio trend:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/madverse.co\/feeds\/blog\/platforms-ai-driven-talent-scouting-music-tech\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">Save rate is a stronger predictor of artist longevity than raw stream counts alone.<\/a> A rising ratio across consecutive releases confirms compounding fan intent.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Playlist source diversification:<\/strong> The share of streams from algorithmic and user-generated playlists should increase relative to editorial playlists over a 60-day window.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Workflow Variations for Weekly and Quarterly Use<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Weekly scans<\/strong> compress the workflow to Phases 1\u20133 only. Run Talent Search with saved filter presets, sort by momentum, and check Predict flags. The output becomes a rapid list of 10\u201320 new names to add to the watchlist for full evaluation in the monthly cycle. Weekly scans usually take 45\u201360 minutes with saved filter configurations.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Quarterly deep-dives<\/strong> extend the workflow by adding a retrospective review of all Phase 6 shortlist artists. For each artist, compare current metrics against the baseline from three months prior and remove artists whose momentum signals have plateaued or declined. Add a Neighboring Artists pass on the top five performers to seed the next quarter&#8217;s candidate pool, and use this review to recalibrate genre-specific thresholds based on observed outcomes.<\/p>\n<h2>Next-Stage Topics After Data Validation<\/h2>\n<p>Artists confirmed through this workflow are ready for two subsequent evaluation stages that sit beyond this tutorial.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Playlist pitching:<\/strong> Submitting shortlisted artists to independent playlist curators and Spotify editorial teams using the playlist journey data and save-rate evidence gathered in Phase 5.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Live-performance validation:<\/strong> Assessing whether streaming momentum translates to ticket demand and audience behavior at live shows, which still acts as a primary indicator of long-term career viability.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Discover your next favorite artist and the stories behind their rise when you explore <a href=\"https:\/\/www.onestowatch.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">OnesToWatch<\/a> for exclusive in-depth content that helps you understand the future of music.<\/p>\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<p><strong>How long does it take to complete the full 7-phase workflow each month?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A complete monthly cycle usually requires 6\u201310 hours spread across two to three sessions. Phases 1 and 2 take about 90 minutes with saved filter presets. Phases 3 and 4 require 2\u20133 hours depending on the size of the candidate pool. Phases 5 and 6 are the most time-intensive, averaging 2\u20134 hours for thorough playlist journey and geography review across 80\u2013120 candidates. Phase 7 hand-off documentation adds 30\u201360 minutes, and weekly scans between monthly cycles add about 45\u201360 minutes per week.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Do I need a paid Chartmetric subscription to access all seven phases?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Talent Search, Neighboring Artists, and Playlist Journey features described in this workflow require a paid Chartmetric plan. The Predict feature, which surfaces 30\u201360-day viral flags, appears on mid-tier and above plans. Basic dashboard access does not include the full filter depth required for Phases 1\u20133, although Chartmetric offers tiered pricing that keeps it accessible to indie labels and independent scouts alongside major-label teams.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What genres produce the most reliable results with this workflow?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The workflow performs most reliably in genres with active short-form video communities, including pop, hip-hop, R&amp;B, and electronic music, because TikTok velocity carries the highest weighting in 2026 AI A&amp;R tools. In niche genres such as folk, jazz, or classical crossover, absolute listener numbers stay structurally lower, so the streams-per-listener ratio and save rate thresholds matter more than raw growth percentages. For niche genres, a 10,000 monthly listener artist with a 5:1 stream ratio is a stronger candidate than a 100,000 listener artist with a 1.5:1 ratio.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How do I avoid shortlisting artists whose growth is driven by paid promotion or bot activity?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Cross-reference streaming growth with listener source data inside Chartmetric. Active sources such as search, library plays, and artist profile visits indicate genuine fan behavior, while streams dominated by algorithmic radio and autoplay need additional validation. Geographic mismatches, such as strong streaming numbers in markets where the artist has never promoted or toured, can point to artificial activity. Shazam heat maps provide an independent geographic signal that is difficult to manipulate artificially, and specialized tools that track bot detection features help you evaluate whether playlist-driven streams are legitimate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What is the realistic monthly output of this workflow for a solo scout?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>A solo scout running the full 7-phase workflow monthly, with weekly scans between cycles, can usually produce a shortlist of 20\u201340 validated candidates per month. Reaching the upper range of 50 candidates typically requires either a second reviewer handling Phase 5 geography checks or pre-built filter presets that cut Phase 1 and 2 setup time to under 30 minutes. Teams of two scouts sharing the workflow can consistently reach 40\u201360 candidates monthly while still meeting the engagement-quality standards needed for credible A&amp;R shortlisting.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion and Next Step with OnesToWatch<\/h2>\n<p>The 7-phase Chartmetric workflow turns raw platform data into a structured, repeatable monthly pipeline of 20\u201350 pre-viral unsigned and developing artists. Each phase produces a concrete output, from filtered candidate pools and momentum-ranked lists to viral-flagged profiles, cluster-expanded candidates, engagement-validated shortlists, and monitored watchlists that feed directly into the next step. The workflow scales from weekly rapid scans to quarterly deep-dives depending on team capacity.<\/p>\n<p>Once a shortlist is confirmed through data, editorial validation becomes the logical next step. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.onestowatch.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">OnesToWatch<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Ones_to_Watch\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noindex nofollow\">alumni include Dua Lipa, Logic, and Imagine Dragons<\/a>, which gives you the editorial credibility that completes the discovery-to-validation journey.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/en\/blog\/the-top-30-artists-to-watch-in-2026?fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMjU2MjgxMDQwNTU4AAGnTAbfp3pnyZuich6q2qOfIz9kmH-WY9qaWJISWZgI6qC7kAouAVjKEPdoNJg_aem_n268rY7j2YC_LY6Cva2j0A\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Check out OnesToWatch&#8217;s Top Artists To Watch in 2026<\/strong><\/a>, the curated editorial list that serves as the final validation layer for every artist your Chartmetric workflow surfaces.<\/p>\n<section data-read-next=\"true\">\n<h2>Read Next<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/resources.onestowatch.com\/how-chartmetric-tracks-emerging-artists\" target=\"_blank\">How Chartmetric Spots and Follows Emerging Artists<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/resources.onestowatch.com\/chartmetric-alternatives-emerging-artists\" target=\"_blank\">Best Chartmetric Alternatives for Artist Discovery<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/resources.onestowatch.com\/chartmetric-ar-talent-scouting-features\" target=\"_blank\">Chartmetric for A&amp;R Talent Scouting: 7-Step Workflow<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/resources.onestowatch.com\/top-chartmetric-alternatives-music-industry\" target=\"_blank\">Best Chartmetric Alternatives for Tracking Emerging Artists<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/resources.onestowatch.com\/chartmetric-alternatives-artist-growth-2026\" target=\"_blank\">Best Tools Like Chartmetric to Track Emerging Artists<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Master Chartmetric&#8217;s 7-phase workflow to spot pre-viral unsigned artists before they break. Explore the next big names right now on OnesToWatch. \ud83c\udfb5<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35,"featured_media":615,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-620","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=620"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2985,"href":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/620\/revisions\/2985"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/615"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/onestowatch.com\/live\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}